Team Production
When it
comes to team production and gift exchange the first thing that comes to mind
for me is group projects. It just so happens that one is coming up in this
class so I thought I would try to bring this topic up because it is very
relatable and relevant to this course. The idea of a group project is perfect
in theory, just like what Jonathan Haidt talks about in, “How to get rich the
Rich to share the Marbles.” With group projects, they are small teams of
students working together to make a better project that they would have made by
themselves, with different viewpoints and work styles meshing together, and
where everyone shares the work equally. With what Jonathan talks about in his
article is how everyone does their part and those who get more give back to
those who get less. So both of these ideas are very sound in theory, but in the
real world, nothing is really that sound.
Group
projects are great and I really do enjoy them, but I myself have had some bad
previous experiences with them, and I think that a lot of other people share
somewhat of the same experiences that I have had. What I am talking about is
the member who does no work and gets the credit. There have been a couple of
group projects that I have been on where there was one kid who really doesn’t do
everything, and everyone else has to pick up the slack and then the whole group
shares a grade. If it is a good grade, the one student who did no work benefits
the most because he did nothing and rode on the tails of everyone else and gets
a good grade. Now I know that team members can tell the teacher that the kid
did nothing, but in all honesty nobody enjoys ratting someone out, so it puts
the other group members in a very particular situation. Relating this to the
article I think that it doesn’t perfectly match up with it, but it revolves
around some of the main concepts.
In the
marble scenario, two people are doing the exact same amount of work but one is
getting a better payoff. It is the opposite in the group project scenario where
not everyone is doing the same work, but they are getting the same payoff. I
believe that what most of us are worried about in life is the payoff. A lot of
people don’t look at the work; they look at the money. People don’t pick jobs because
they are easy, they pick jobs because they will make more money with those
jobs. So with gift exchange in my group project example, everyone wants the
gift of a good grade, and some might be willing to put in the work, but others
might not be, and this deals with fairness. I think that the success in this
example relies on good communication from those involved, and proper
organization.
Luckily
group projects work most of the time and students split the work equally and
get back what they put in. The issue with this in the real world is that
everyone is out for themselves and people value their work differently. Some people
do get the short end of the stick, and I don’t know if our economy will ever be
able to fix that.